Why hasn’t Canada backed a UN treaty to tackle the rise of plastic pollution on a global level?
LONDON: The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) has urged Canada to break its silence over support for a UN Treaty on Plastic Pollution.
An open letter urging action to Jonathan Wilkinson, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, has been signed by 42 of Canada’s leading scientists representing a diverse array of specialist research areas, from climate change and microplastics to fisheries and indigenous environmental health.
On 12 May, the Canadian Government announced the listing of “plastic manufactured items” under Schedule 1 Toxic Substances List of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
This is an important step in addressing the plastic pollution crisis, but EIA remains baffled as to why a country clearly committed to action on plastics through this legislative amendment remain tight-lipped over whether or not it supports a global plastics agreement which already has the backing of more than 70 per cent of the world’s countries.
It is hoped the country will send a positive signal at either the 12th Arctic Council Ministerial Meeting in Reykjavik on 20 May or at the G7 from 11-13 June to show its commitment to protecting the planet and lead efforts towards an ambitious plastics treaty.
Canadians discard three million tonnes of plastic waste year, only nine per cent of which is recycled. The vast majority of plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated and about 29,000 tonnes finds its way into the natural environment.
After decades of failed voluntary efforts and a patchwork of incongruent laws and policies around the world, the issue of plastic pollution has only worsened. It has become increasingly clear that preventing plastic pollution requires something missing at the global level and all countries are needed to make it happen.
With two-thirds of countries including Vietnam, the EU, the 54 countries of the Africa Group, the Pacific Islands and the UK already expressing support for a global plastics agreement, question marks hang heavy over the Canadian Government.
Christina Dixon, Deputy Campaign Lead for Oceans at EIA, said: “Plastic pollution is widely recognised as one of the most salient environmental and human health crises of the modern time. From extraction of the fossil fuels used to produce it to its manufacture, use, and end of life disposal, the lifecycle of plastic severely impacts every level of biological organisation – from genes to ecosystems.
“We must tackle this as a global community with support from all governments or the world will fall short on implementing truly effective solutions to save our planet. We implore Canada to break its silence and back the call for a plastics treaty.”
Dr Max Liboiron, of Memorial University, Newfoundland, noted: “Our research has shown that plastics from Canada’s east coast drift to Greenland, Iceland and the western coasts of Europe from the tip of Scotland to the south of Spain. We need clear international cooperation and concrete goals to address global plastic waste flows.”
Sabaa Khan, from the David Suzuki Foundation, said: “Plastic is ubiquitous throughout land and water ecosystems in both visible and invisible form, infiltrating food webs and human bodies. It is widely recognised today that the way we have produced, used and disposed of plastics has profoundly affected ecosystem health and the enjoyment of human rights.
“Unless Canada and other countries begin to regulate the plastics lifecycle with these concerns at the forefront – and with a commitment to transparency, responsibility and accountability – the plastic pollution crisis will continue to rise.”
CONTACTS FOR MEDIA
EDITORS’ NOTES
Environmental Investigation Agency
62-63 Upper Street
London N1 0NY
UK
www.eia-international.org
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7354 7960
ends